<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confirmed! Theme Decks will have exclusive URs.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://houshasen.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/confirmed-theme-deck-will-have-exclusive-urs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://houshasen.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/confirmed-theme-deck-will-have-exclusive-urs/</link>
	<description>The latest Eye of Judgment News from Japan, EOJ Deck Samples, Strategy and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: houshasen</title>
		<link>http://houshasen.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/confirmed-theme-deck-will-have-exclusive-urs/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>houshasen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houshasen.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I know.  I was a bit afraid they may mix up several set.1 cards in the Set.2 theme decks since Set.2 cards appear to work in conjunction with Set.1.

There are still several cards in the theme decks that are not shown.  So strictly speaking these may still end up as Set.1 cards, but at least so far it appears only 2 cards out of 30 are Set.1, and I think I can tolerate 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know.  I was a bit afraid they may mix up several set.1 cards in the Set.2 theme decks since Set.2 cards appear to work in conjunction with Set.1.</p>
<p>There are still several cards in the theme decks that are not shown.  So strictly speaking these may still end up as Set.1 cards, but at least so far it appears only 2 cards out of 30 are Set.1, and I think I can tolerate 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spazzfish</title>
		<link>http://houshasen.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/confirmed-theme-deck-will-have-exclusive-urs/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Spazzfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houshasen.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Putting any set 1 cards in these themes is more then a bit cheeky i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting any set 1 cards in these themes is more then a bit cheeky i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Gambler</title>
		<link>http://houshasen.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/confirmed-theme-deck-will-have-exclusive-urs/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Gambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houshasen.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Set 1 cards in theme decks, OUCH....   I sincerly hope they won&#039;t try to push some in random booster packs...   Well, at least we&#039;re getting two rares. Somehow though, it&#039;s probably because by being in theme decks, they will be harder to get in random packs, so truly forcing people to buy all theme decks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set 1 cards in theme decks, OUCH&#8230;.   I sincerly hope they won&#8217;t try to push some in random booster packs&#8230;   Well, at least we&#8217;re getting two rares. Somehow though, it&#8217;s probably because by being in theme decks, they will be harder to get in random packs, so truly forcing people to buy all theme decks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
